‘Better sign posting needed on the journey to circularity’
Development of a circular economy is being held back a lack of awareness and knowledge, say local government and other industry stakeholder groups.
Deficits in supportive policies, regulations, and standards across all levels of government are also perceived as a barrier to circular economy progress in Australia’s built environment, according to a stakeholder survey conducted by the Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA).
The survey results, published in A Circular Economy Discussion Paper found five barriers to progress, including:
- Incomplete
understanding and awareness of circularity; - Insufficient
collaboration across the sector; - Absence
of agreed metrics; - Absence
of financial incentives; and - A
lack of material processing infrastructure.
But there was agreement among those interviewed that all levels of government have a key role to play in creating an enabling environment for the circular economy.
Key
policies that were suggested as enabling development included:
- Encouraging
or mandating reuse through an expansion of extended producer responsibility
under the federal government’s remit; - new
industry-led product stewardship schemes or improvement to existing schemes is
being explored through The National Product Stewardship Investment Fund; - Reforming
waste classification to allow for end-of-use treatment and trade of materials; - Regulating
waste to landfill, either through increases to waste levies or banning material
to landfill under the state government’s remit; - Making
waste regulations consistent across states and territories; - Reducing
the conservatism in state regulation bodies around product standards to allow
for international evidence on new circular products; and - Mandating
recycled content, if not in the private sector then at least for the public
sector.
In related news, PwC has released a report on circularity which quantifies the potential environmental and economic benefit of adopting a circular economy model.
PwC says its modelling “suggests that Australia could generate $1860 billion in direct economic benefits over 20 years and save 165 million tonnes of CO2 per year by 2040”.
